The program runs. Nothing slips. Everything holds up.
Peerexa is the operational layer for conference review — coordinate reviewers at scale, surface integrity problems early, and deliver decisions that stand behind scrutiny. With a reviewer network built in, you never start from zero.
Review is where good programs quietly break.
Assignments, reminders, and status live across spreadsheets and inboxes. Chasing reviewers becomes the job.
Integrity problems and text overlap surface late — often after a decision is already on the table.
Scores, discussion, and rationale scatter — making decisions hard to reach and harder to defend.
Every other tool starts you from zero. Peerexa starts you with a network.
Submission systems manage submissions. Spreadsheets track chaos. And every one of them leaves the hardest problem to you: finding, convincing, and managing the reviewers themselves — from a blank list and your personal inbox, every single year. Peerexa is the only platform where the review workflow comes with the reviewer network attached: search verified academics by field and track, see who you’ve already worked with, invite in one click — and keep one consistent standard for review, integrity, and decisions across every event you run. The workflow is the product. The network is the moat.
Nothing slips. Nothing surprises you in week nine.
Assign one at a time or in bulk. Work from operational queues, match reviewers with capacity in mind, and let automatic reminders do the chasing.
- Single & bulk assignment
- Capacity-aware matching
- Operational queues & automatic reminders
Search a real network — not your inbox.
Search a network of verified academics by field, country, and track. See prior-relationship signals up front, then invite in a click.
- Filter by field, country & track
- Prior-relationship signals
- One-click invitations
AI assistance alongside your reviewers.
AI-assisted reviews sit beside your human reviewers — surfacing structure, checks, and first-pass observations — while people stay in charge of judgment and every decision.
- First-pass observations, clearly labelled
- Humans own the scores and the decision
Know about problems while you can still act on them.
Similarity and integrity checks are integrated into the workflow — text overlap and integrity risks surface early, with clear risk levels, while you can still act on them.
- Similarity & integrity checks in-workflow
- Flagged early — not after acceptance
Decisions you can defend — to authors, committees, and your future self.
Bring scores and discussion together, support editorial and committee decisions, and generate professional decision letters — every outcome traceable to the review behind it.
- Decision support with full context
- Editorial & committee decisions
- Professional decision letters
Hand-off day takes an afternoon, not a week.
Author packages, internal archives, and structured CSV/JSON — plus verifiable reviewer certificates issued automatically to the academics who did the work.
See where the program is slipping before it costs you.
Portfolio dashboards, bottleneck detection, and reviewer intelligence tell you where a program is slipping — and which reviewers to lean on — while there’s still time to act.
You don't replace anything. You layer on top.
Keep your submission system. Bring submissions in, run the review, integrity, and decision layer in Peerexa, and send results back out.
Upload submissions & reviewers
Add records directly
Programmatic integration
Event-driven updates
Not a submission system · not a conference website builder · not an EasyChair replacement.
One standard across every event you run.
Multi-event, recurring programs need consistency, shared reviewer pools, and portfolio oversight. We work with societies and publishers as a long-term standard — not a one-off tool.
Talk to us →"We staffed our whole program committee from Peerexa — matched to topics and tracks. Integrity flags now surface before the decision, not after acceptance."
"As a society running six events a year, one consistent standard changed everything. Our chairs stopped reinventing the process each cycle."
See it on your own program.
Book a walkthrough and we'll show you review, integrity, and decisions on a program like yours.