A network with a memory.
On one side, organizers who need rigorous review without the chaos. On the other, academics whose reviewing work deserves to count. Peerexa connects them: organizers discover and invite verified reviewers and run the whole review lifecycle; reviewers build a portable, verifiable professional record with every conference they serve. Each side makes the other stronger — that's the point.
DISCOVERY
Run review like it's your profession. Because it is.
Coordinate reviewers at scale, catch integrity problems before they become decisions, and hand off clean, defensible outcomes — with a reviewer network built in, so you never start from an empty list.
- Assignment & reminders on autopilot
- Integrity checks in the workflow
- Decisions & professional exports
- A searchable network of verified academics
The reviewing you already do should count.
Claim a profile you own for your whole career. Earn verifiable certificates for review and committee service — built for promotion files, annual review, and visa dossiers. Be discovered for work in your field, on your terms, at your capacity. It's the professional profile academics keep for their whole career — at a public address you own.
Simple on both sides.
Everything review needs. Nothing it doesn't.
The four pillars of the platform — explore them in depth on the Platform page.
Built for everyone who runs — or does — peer review.
One event or a series — run the whole review lifecycle in one place.
For organizers →One consistent standard across every event you run, year after year.
For programs →Rigorous, auditable review for the events your institution hosts.
For institutions →A career-long professional record, free forever.
For reviewers →Short reads that sharpen how you run review.
All resources →Peer review is carrying more weight than ever — with less support than ever.
Submission volumes are climbing. Reviewer fatigue is real. Integrity risks are getting harder to see, and the tools that promised to help have been absorbed by the very publishers they were meant to stay neutral toward. The result: the process science depends on most runs on spreadsheets, personal inboxes, and unpaid, invisible labor. We built Peerexa because peer review deserves real infrastructure — neutral, professional, and accountable to the people who actually do the work. Organizers get a serious operational layer. Reviewers get a record that finally counts. And the trust underneath science gets a foundation.
Plainly, then.
The review layer for academic conferences: reviewer coordination, integrity checks, decisions, and exports for organizers — plus a professional reviewing network where academics build a verified, portable record of their reviewing work.
No. Authors don't log in. You bring submissions in from your existing setup — CSV, manual entry, API, or webhooks — and Peerexa runs the review, integrity, and decision layer on top.
No. Peerexa layers on top of whatever submission system you already use.
Yes — always. Claiming a profile, earning certificates, and being discovered never costs an academic anything. Organizations pay to run review; reviewers never do.
You do. Reviewers control the visibility of their own profiles and records. Files are accessed through secure signed links, access is role-scoped, and every meaningful action is recorded in an audit trail.
Not a publisher. We don't publish, we don't sell your data, and we don't steer review toward anyone's commercial agenda.
Two ways in.
Free to start · no credit card.
Prefer to look first? Try the workload calculator →